Even with fraudulent concealment, limitations will run if plaintiff could have found out the true facts.

Because the Rosses could have discovered Shell’s alleged fraud through the use of reasonable diligence, we hold that, as a matter of law, the doctrine of fraudulent concealment cannot apply to toll the statute of limitations.

Shell Oil Co., et al. v. Ross, No. 10-0429, 55 Tex.S.Ct.J. 223 (Tex. 2011).

Isn't true that if you are the victim, in hindsight, you see how and why you were defrauded?